Colleen Hardwick
Colleen Hardwick is running for Mayor of Vancouver with TEAM for a Livable Vancouver. Their campaign website presents a campaign focused on Housing. The published positions supports simplify and speed up approvals for new housing; supports New housing should only be approved where it fits the existing scale and character of the neighbourhood.
Verified positions
Positions supported by public campaign material or another attributable source. These enter the questionnaire comparison without an inference label.
Supports simplifying zoning, development and building-permit processes to reduce time and costs.
TEAM will visit all 22 officially-designated neighbourhoods in the city of Vancouver to listen to residents' thoughts...
Qualification: Density balanced against infrastructure capacity and neighbourhood context.
Limit tax increases to inflation to maintain municipal services at levels agreed to by voters.
Supports limiting property-tax increases to inflation while maintaining agreed municipal services.
TEAM says the UBC SkyTrain extension should be reconsidered alongside alternatives and a business case rather than treated as a settled commitment.
Qualification: Calls for reconsideration and comparison of alternatives rather than categorical rejection.
Reverse council's decision and restore off-street parking minimums for all new construction...
Expand tree planting, mature tree protections, retention and enhancement of green space, and consider the heat island impacts of development growth when planning communities.
Supports streamlining permitting for business establishment and expansion.
Supports preserving an independent elected Park Board and returning finance, operations and facilities to its jurisdiction.
...pledge $739 million over four years to invest in our parks and recreation facilities
Qualification: Subject to an annual baseline review of the Park Board budget.
We will review funding for non-profits to make sure the city is getting value for money and that we are focused on core responsibilities.
Qualification: Review framed around value for money and core responsibilities, not around increasing funding.
TEAM supports MSTDC to develop their lands, however, the public has not been satisfied that the Jericho Lands in particular has been planned properly within the local context, so the Jericho Lands will be reconsidered through neighbourhood-based community planning.
Qualification: Jericho Lands to be reconsidered through neighbourhood-based community planning.
AI-inferred positions
These are transparent estimates drawn from related public material, not statements the candidate made in answer to these exact questions. Each estimate is flagged with its source, confidence, and model reasoning, and is used only where no verified position is available.
Growth and development should be planned in consultation with local residents and within the scale and context of each neighbourhood.
Why the model reads it this way: TEAM supports housing and services but emphasizes neighbourhood fit and consultation. That does not point clearly toward maintaining or reversing this specific pause, so the estimate is mixed.
Would refocus the City on core responsibilities including policing, sanitation and bylaw enforcement.
Why the model reads it this way: TEAM places policing among its core public-safety tools, but its platform does not establish that additional police funding is the main determinant of safety.
Pledges major capital investment in parks and recreation facilities.
Why the model reads it this way: A large parks-and-recreation capital plan makes additional washrooms plausible, but TEAM does not make a specific citywide washroom commitment in the reviewed material.